Most sustainability platforms help you fill out someone else's framework...
These are necessary tools. But they answer a narrow question: "Are we compliant?"
We answer a harder question: "Is this organization actually creating value for its stakeholders?"
Every element in ValuuCompass serves a purpose. Stakeholders define who matters. Impact domains define what matters. Policy objectives define what the organization should commit to. And performance indicators define the specific, quantifiable target against which performance is measured.
The Value Model wasn't assembled from a checklist. It draws from 59 leading global frameworks — GRI, SASB, TCFD, ISSB, EFRAG, B Impact Assessment, UN, OECD, ISO, and major stock exchange requirements — analyzing over 2,000 individual impact measurements to produce 81 policy objectives and 168 performance indicators. 10 years of academic research at the Value Research Center at Doshisha University, Kyoto.
GRI, SASB, TCFD, ISSB, EFRAG, B Impact, UN, OECD, ISO, and more
Distilled into 168 non-overlapping, measurable indicators
Cross-sector applicability with industry-specific benchmarks
Value Research Center, Doshisha University, Kyoto
A company can have a perfect policy but zero outcomes. Traditional ratings hide this. ValuuCompass makes it the centerpiece, and enforces a critical rule: value scores can only be calculated when disclosure quality reaches calculation-ready (DQ3). No shortcuts. No interpolation.
Does a formal, written commitment exist?
Binary: policy exists or it doesn't. No partial credit.
How complete and transparent is the reporting?
DQ0: silence. DQ1: claims only. DQ2: partial data. DQ3: calculation-ready with defined methodology.
Is there measurable evidence of outcomes?
Only scored when DQ=3. Measures actual quantified outcomes against defined performance targets.
Has it been independently verified?
Third-party audit, certified methodology, external review. Only 10% of claims industry-wide meet this bar.
How the organization treats the people who work for it
How the organization impacts the natural environment
How the organization contributes to the communities around it
How the organization governs itself and manages its finances
How the organization serves and protects its customers
How the organization works with its supply chain and distribution partners
How the organization creates long-term value for its owners
Environmental, Social, Governance: three broad categories that conflate unrelated issues. Employee safety and community investment land in the same "S" bucket. A company can score well on "E" by reporting emissions while ignoring biodiversity. The categories create cover, not clarity.
Seven stakeholder groups, each with their own impact domains, policy objectives, and measurable performance indicators. You can't hide a governance failure inside an environmental score. You can't offset poor employee treatment with strong community investment. Every stakeholder is assessed independently, with full transparency.
168 performance indicators. 7 stakeholders. 4 scoring dimensions. Full evidence chains. A measurement system, not a reporting tool. Built to replace the guesswork.
